An Independent Financial Advisory Firm
An Independent Financial Advisory Firm
Magnus Financial Group LLC is an independent, SEC-registered investment management firm headquartered in New York City. We specialize in providing customized wealth management and financial planning services to a diverse clientele, including high-net-worth individuals.
| Fidelity Brokerage Services LLC, Member NYSE/SIPC | Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. Member FINRA/SIPC | Interactive Brokers LLC, Member NYSE/FINRA/SIPC |
Active clients will receive account statements directly from their qualified custodian at least quarterly. Statements should detail all transactions during the period. If you have any questions or are not receiving account statements at least quarterly, please contact us. If at any time you experience any changes in your investment objectives or risk tolerance, please contact us to determine if changes to your investment elections are necessary.
This website is provided by Magnus Financial Group LLC (“Magnus” or the “Firm”) for informational purposes only. Investing involves the risk of loss and investors should be prepared to bear potential losses. Past performance may not be indicative of future results and may be impacted by events and economic conditions that will not prevail in the future. No portion of this commentary is to be construed as a solicitation to buy or sell a security or the provision of personalized investment, tax or legal advice. Certain information contained herein this is derived from sources that Magnus believes to be reliable; however, the Firm does not guarantee the accuracy or timeliness of such information and assumes no liability for any resulting damages.
Magnus is an SEC registered investment adviser that maintains a principal place of business in New York. The Firm may only transact in those states which our notice is filed or qualifies for a corresponding exemption from such requirements. View Magnus Privacy Notice for more details. For information about Magnus’s registration status and business operations, please consult the Firm’s Form ADV disclosure documents, the most recent versions of which are available on the SEC’s Investment Adviser Public Disclosure website at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov
Michael S. Schwartz is primarily licensed in New York and may be licensed in other states. AR License # 444300, CA License # 0H02771
Certified Financial Planner Board of Standards Inc. owns the certification marks CFP®, CERTIFIED FINANCIAL PLANNER™ and CFP® (with flame design) in the U.S., which it awards to individuals who successfully complete CFP Board’s initial and ongoing certification requirements
Regarding client privacy, please view the following Magnus Privacy Notice
Market Commentary
Market Commentary – Q1, 2025
Gambit
The U.S. economy continued its steady pace of growth throughout 2024
Overview
U.S. equity markets faced a challenging first quarter. U.S. large-cap stocks, as represented by the S&P 500, ended the first three months of 2025 down 4.3%, while the small-cap Russell 2000 Index declined 9.5%. This marked the worst quarter for both U.S. large- and small-cap stocks since the second quarter of 2022. In contrast, U.S. fixed income markets fared better, with the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index gaining 2.8% in the first three months of the new year.
Final fourth-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) results, released at the end of March, confirmed that the U.S. economy continued its steady pace of growth throughout 2024. GDP growth for the quarter was revised marginally upward, from 2.3% to an annualized 2.4%.1 Government spending increased at an annualized rate of 3.1% while consumer spending grew by 4.0%—the strongest pace of 2024.
U.S. household debt-to-GDP levels have declined to 70%
Personal savings levels increased as income growth outpaced spending
Personal income has grown steadily in 2025, rising 0.9% month-over-month in January, followed by another strong increase of 0.8% in February. Although personal savings remain below pre-pandemic levels, they have started to recover, reaching 4.6% in February as income growth outpaced spending.2 Meanwhile, U.S. household debt-to-GDP levels have declined to 70%, the lowest since 2001.
Earnings growth estimates have started to decline
Inflation remains sticky, but there are promising signs. Headline inflation rose to 3.0% year -over-year in January before easing to 2.8% in February, aided by declines in food and energy prices. Notably, core inflation in February rose at the slowest pace since April 2021, increasing by 3.1% year-over-year3 As expected, the Federal Reserve kept interest rates unchanged at its March Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) meeting. Despite inflation above 2%, Fed officials still anticipate the equivalent of two 0.25% rate reductions for 2025, while market expectations for rate cuts increased from two 0.25% cuts to three, with the first cut expected in June.4 The Fed also announced plans to slow the pace of quantitative tightening, reducing its monthly runoff from $60 billion to $40 billion, with a maximum Treasury runoff of $5 billion per month starting in April5 Fed Chair Jerome Powell attributed this decision to the debt ceiling, which was reached in January.
The U.S. administration is playing a high-stakes economic gambit
Gambit
In chess, a gambit is a strategy where a player deliberately sacrifices a piece in the opening to gain a positional or tactical advantage. The goal is usually to achieve faster development, gain better control of the board, or put the opponent in a difficult situation.
As the economy adjusts to reduced government spending and the impact of tariffs, President Donald Trump and Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent are willing to accept short -term economic pain to pursue potential long-term gains.
The Mar-a-Lago Accord is a conceptual economic strategy proposed by the Trump administration that aims to restructure the global financial system to reduce U.S. debt and address economic imbalances7 Key elements of the proposal include boosting American manufacturing and restructuring U.S. debt by leveraging tariffs and geopolitical influence, including pressuring trade partners to absorb financial burdens and adjust currency values8Though not an official policy, the Mar-a-Lago Accord envisions reshaping global trade and finance by tying economic measures to national security (while sparking debate over its feasibility and risks).
The Trump administration’s high-stakes economic gambit seeks to reduce government spending and increase revenue to extend the expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act beyond its scheduled expiration at the end of 2025. The administration has also proposed eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits, overtime, and tips, which would reduce government revenue by over $1.5 trillion over the next ten years.9,10
The Trump administration’s high-stakes economic gambit seeks to reduce government spending and increase revenue to extend the expiring Tax Cuts and Jobs Act beyond its scheduled expiration at the end of 2025. The administration has also proposed eliminating income taxes on Social Security benefits, overtime, and tips, which would reduce government revenue by over $1.5 trillion over the next ten years.9,10
There is overwhelming support for the government’s policies on eliminating wasteful government spending and fraud
The government has made it clear that reducing the fiscal deficit is a primary objective. The Department of Government Efficiency (or DOGE)—established to enhance government accountability and efficiency through strategic oversight and reform—claims to have already saved the government approximately $140 billion11 While this remains a small fraction of the $1.2 trillion fiscal deficit accumulated so far this fiscal year, the initiative, spearheaded by Elon Musk, appears to have widespread support, at least for now12,13,14 Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent has publicly endorsed Musk’s efforts, stating, “I am completely aligned with what Elon’s doing“15 Public sentiment also favors cutting wasteful government spending. A recent Harvard CAPS-Harris poll of over 2,400 registered U.S. voters found overwhelming support for the government’s policies on eliminating fraud and waste in government spending, as well as reducing previously allocated expenditures13 The survey revealed that 77% of Americans believe a full review of government spending is necessary, while 83%—including 72% of Democrats and 94% of Republicans—agree that spending should be cut13 According to Musk, DOGE aims to achieve its goal of cutting wasteful government spending by $1 trillion by the end of May 2025.16
On April 2, Trump announced widespread tariffs
One of the Trump administration’s opening moves has been implementing aggressive targeted tariffs on various countries and global trade sectors, citing national security and economic interests. On April 2, baseline tariffs of 10% were announced on all imports to the U.S., and higher rates were implemented for major trading partners17,18 U.S. trade partners with the highest reciprocal tariffs include China (54%), the European Union (20%), Vietnam (46%), South Africa (30%), and Japan (24%)17,18 Unlike China, Canada and Mexico avoided additional tariffs. The Trump administration also confirmed a 25% tariff on all foreign-made automobiles.
In 2018, during his first term, President Trump tweeted:
“The European Union is coming to Washington tomorrow to negotiate a deal on trade… Both the U.S. and EU [should] drop all tariffs, barriers, and subsidies. That would finally be called [a] free market and fair trade…”19
The Trump administration appears to be leveraging tariffs for two primary purposes: as a negotiating tool and as a macroeconomic strategy. When used as a macroeconomic tool, these tariffs are designed to protect domestic U.S. industries and encourage reshoring. Unlike most countries, the U.S. has historically maintained relatively low trade barriers, with an average tariff rate of roughly 3%. A third reason for aggressive tariffs on Canada and Mexico was to curb drug trafficking and stop the flow of drugs crossing into the U.S. via neighboring borders. Recent data from the U.S. Customs and Border Protection shows drug seizures in February dropping to the lowest level in at least three years.20
Unlike most countries, the U.S. had historically maintained low trade barriers
Global corporations have pledged nearly $1Tn in U.S. investment since Trump’s inauguration
Several countries have already proposed tariff cuts on U.S. imports in efforts to avoid reciprocal tariffs. For example, India has offered to cut tariffs on over half of U.S. imports, including farm products such as almonds, worth $23 billion21 Similarly, the European Union is engaged in talks to identify potential concessions in exchange for the partial removal of U.S. tariffs22To avoid or mitigate tariffs, global corporations have pledged nearly $1 trillion in U.S. investment since Trump’s inauguration23 Apple, for example, has committed $500 billion over the next four years, while Taiwan Semiconductor plans to invest $100 billion to advance semiconductor manufacturing in the U.S., and South Korea’s Hyundai investing $21 billion over the next three years to improve the U.S. supply chain and build a new steel plant in Louisiana.23,24
Investor sentiment declined sharply in March
But all gambits come at an immediate cost. Investor sentiment declined sharply in March. The American Association of Individual Investors (AAII) sentiment survey showed bearish sentiment rising to a one-year high of 61% in the last week of February, and sentiment remained negative throughout March. An average of 58% of survey respondents expressed a bearish outlook for U.S. equities over the next six months25 Similarly, the Bank of America’s Global Fund Manager Survey in March recorded the largest pullback in investor sentiment in five years. In just three months, the percentage of fund managers overweight in U.S. equities fell from a record high to one of the lowest levels in over twenty years.26 While the National Federation of Independent Businesses (NFIB) Small Business Optimism Index remained above average in February, the Small Business Uncertainty Index rose to its second-highest level on record since 1975.27
Consumer expectations for personal finances dropped to the lowest level since 1978
Consumer confidence followed a similar downward trajectory. The Conference Board’s Consumer Confidence Index in March fell to its lowest level since the pandemic, and the University of Michigan’s survey recorded its lowest sentiment reading since November 2022.28,29 The University of Michigan survey also found that expectations for personal finances hit the lowest level since 1978, and an unprecedented 51% of respondents made unsolicited negative comments about government economic policy29,30 Depending on political affiliation, consumer inflation expectations notably diverged over the quarter. Those identifying as Democrats expect inflation to more than double, rising to 6.5% over the next year, while Republican-leaning survey respondents believe that inflation is going to all but disappear over the next twelve months. Across both investor and consumer surveys, tariffs were cited as the primary driver of growing uncertainty.
Inflation expectations by political affiliation have diverged
The Federal Reserve’s latest economic projections, released at the March Federal Open Market Committee meeting, suggest that they believe tariffs are unlikely to have a lasting impact on inflation. While year-over-year inflation expectations for 2025 have risen from 2.5% to 2.8%, the Fed forecasts inflation to decline to 2.2% in 2026 and 2.0% the following year, indicating that any potential tariff-related price pressures may be temporary31 The Fed’s 2025 outlook expects a slight slowdown in economic growth (from 2.1% to 1.7% year-over-year), and unemployment is projected to remain near historic lows at 4.4%.31
European equities had their strongest quarter relative to the S&P 500 since September 1985
Markets
U.S. equity markets reached a stalemate in March. Large-cap stocks fell over 4% for the month, capping off their worst quarter since early 2022 and underperforming global equities by the widest margin since 2009. In fact, European equities had their strongest quarter relative to the S&P 500 since September 1985, outperforming U.S. large-cap stocks by 15% when the Plaza Accord was signed with the goal of weakening the dollar to reduce the U.S. trade deficit.32 U.S. small-cap stocks ended the quarter down nearly 10%, their worst quarterly performance since the second quarter of 2022 when the Russell 2000 declined by 18%.
The Magnificent Seven ended the first quarter down 16%
The Magnificent Seven—Apple, Microsoft, Amazon, Alphabet, Nvidia, Meta, and Tesla—have been a driving force behind the S&P 500’s rally in recent years, fueled by strong fundamentals, market leadership, and exposure to transformative trends like artificial intelligence. However, together, the group ended the first quarter down 16%, driven by Tesla (-36%), Nvidia (-19%), and Alphabet (-18%). Tesla was the second-worst performing company in the S&P 500, surpassed only by Deckers Outdoor, which ended the quarter down 45%. The downturn in stock prices led to a pullback in valuations, bringing the Magnificent Seven’s valuation premium relative to the rest of the S&P 500 to its lowest level since 2017.33
International equity markets outperformed U.S. equities in the first quarter of 2025. Large-cap stocks in developed international markets outpaced their U.S. counterparts by more than 10%, with the MSCI EAFE Index gaining 7%. In Europe, investor optimism—fueled by an $860 billion defense spending package—helped push the MSCI Europe up 11% during the quarter. Of note, German stocks, proxied by the MSCI Germany Index, rallied 16%. Similarly, international developed-market small-cap stocks rose 4% over the quarter, whereas U.S. small-cap stocks fell 10%, making them the worst-performing major asset class year-to-date.
U.S. and non-U.S. equity valuations are back within five-year averages
Among emerging markets, Brazil (+14.1%) and China (+15.0%) led the gains. Meanwhile, after reaching a two-year high on January 13, the U.S. dollar weakened, ending the quarter down 4%. This sharp reversal in performance brought relative valuations between U.S. and non-U.S. stocks back in line with their five-year average, although they remain above longer-term averages.34
Fixed-income markets had a strong start to the year, with U.S. intermediate-term bonds gaining 3% over the quarter. After rising to 4.8% in mid-January (the highest level since October 2023), the 10-year U.S. Treasury yield ended March below 4.2% due to rising uncertainty surrounding tariffs. The yield curve (the spread between the 10-year and 2- year Treasury yields) remained positive throughout the quarter, finishing March at 0.3%.
Gold gained 20% over the quarter, closing March at a new all-time high above $3,100. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices declined by $7 per barrel over the quarter to end at $71 per barrel, despite news of slowing U.S. oil production, which in January fell to the lowest level in a year.
Fixed-income markets had a strong start to the year
Gold gained 20% over the quarter, closing March at a new all-time high above $3,100
Looking Forward
President Trump and Treasury Secretary Bessent appear to be playing the long game, hoping that consumers and markets—particularly bond markets—will look beyond a short-term period of uncertainty, or “detox” in the words of Bessent, in exchange for the long-term benefits stemming from a reduced fiscal deficit, increased domestic manufacturing and reshoring, economic growth, and more balanced global trade practices. In many ways, their approach resembles a gambit in chess—deliberately sacrificing short-term stability in pursuit of long-term gains. The key question remains whether this is a calculated risk that will ultimately pay off or if the so-called chess game will end in checkmate for U.S. economic growth.
Citations
1. BEA: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product
2. Federal Reserve of St. Louis: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/PSAVERT
3. Federal Reserve of St. Louis: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPILFESL
4. CME FedWatch: https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html
5. Federal Reserve: https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20250319.pdf
6. FactSet: https://advantage.factset.com/hubfs/Website/Resources%20Section/Research%20Desk/Earnings%20Insight/EarningsInsight_032825.pdf
7. Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-20/-mar-a-lago-accord-chatter-is-getting-wallstreet-s-attention
8. Financial Times: https://www.ft.com/content/fba87dd3-514a-41c2-b2b9-ea597ffbdfbf
9. Penn Wharton Budget Model: https://budgetmodel.wharton.upenn.edu/issues/2025/2/10/eliminating-income-taxes-on-social-security-benefits
10. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/shaharziv/2025/03/05/trump-speech-to-congress-renews-call-for-no-tax-ontips/
11. Department of Government Efficiency: https://www.doge.gov/savings
12. AP-NORC: https://apnorc.org/projects/although-support-for-doge-is-mixed-a-majority-believe-corruptioninefficiency-and-red-tape-are-major-problems/
13. Harvard-Harris Poll: https://harvardharrispoll.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/02/HHP_Feb2025_vFinal.pdf
14. AP News: https://apnews.com/article/ap-norc-poll-trump-musk-doge-approval-23d49b2dcdadd0d6f625c6b4451b2c8d
15. All-In Podcast: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lSma9suyp24
16. Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-27/musk-says-doge-aims-to-finish-1-trillion-incuts-by-end-of-may
17. BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/c1jxrnl9xe2o
18. Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/trump-tariffs-trade-war-stock-market-04-02-2025
19. Jeff Weniger via X: https://x.com/JeffWeniger/status/1899544455981498719/photo/2
20. U.S. Customs and Border Protection: https://www.cbp.gov/newsroom/stats/drug-seizure-statistics
21. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/world/india/india-offers-us-tariff-cuts-farm-imports-eyes-trade-successgovernment-sources-2025-03-28/
22. Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/newsletters/2025-03-28/eu-identifies-concessions-for-trump-intrade-war
23. Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-02-25/apple-openai-among-tech-firms-pledging-over-1-trillion-since-trump-took-office
24. CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/24/south-korea-hyundai-us-investment.html
25. AAII: https://www.aaii.com/sentimentsurvey/sent_results
26. Financial Times: https://www.ft.com/content/d43b2929-74b4-4121-9c58-1eba5be321bc
27. NFIB: https://www.nfib.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/03/NFIB-SBET-Report-Feb.-2025.pdf
28. Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/livecoverage/stock-market-today-dow-nasdaq-sp500-03-25-2025/card/consumer-confidence-drops-further-key-measure-flags-recession-risk-JCuJNmUtCUAJgblTrwUm
29. Bloomberg: https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2025-03-14/us-consumer-sentiment-drops-price-expectations-soar-on-tariffs
30. Michael McDonough via X: https://x.com/M_McDonough/status/1905628662528950301/photo/1
31. Federal Reserve: https://www.federalreserve.gov/monetarypolicy/files/fomcprojtabl20250319.pdf
32. Investopedia: https://www.investopedia.com/terms/p/plaza-accord.asp
33. CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2025/03/14/techs-3-week-selloff-wipes-out-2point7-trillion-in-value-frommegacaps.html
34. Bloomberg, SpringTide calculations based on forward price-to-earnings for Russell 1000 vs. MSCI ACWI Ex-U.S.
Share it :
Disclaimer
Magnus Financial Group LLC (“Magnus”) did not produce and bears no responsibility for any part of this report whatsoever, including but not limited to any microeconomic views, inaccuracies or any errors or omissions. Research and data used in the presentation have come from third-party sources that Magnus has not independently verified presentation and the opinions expressed are not by Magnus or its employees and are current only as of the time made and are subject to change without notice.
This report may include estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements, however, due to numerous factors, actual events may differ substantially from those presented. The graphs and tables making up this report have been based on unaudited, third-party data and performance information provided to us by one or more commercial databases. Except for the historical information contained in this report, certain matters are forward looking statements or projections that are dependent upon risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to factors and considerations such as general market volatility, global economic risk, geopolitical risk, currency risk and other country-specific factors, fiscal and monetary policy, the level of interest rates, security-specific risks, and historical market segment or sector performance relationships as they relate to the business and economic cycle.
Additionally, please be aware that past performance is not a guide to the future performance of any manager or strategy, and that the performance results and historical information provided displayed herein may have been adversely or favorably impacted by events and economic conditions that will not prevail in the future. Therefore, it should not be inferred that these results are indicative of the future performance of any strategy, index, fund, manager or group of managers. Index benchmarks contained in this report are provided so that performance can be compared with the performance of well-known and widely recognized indices. Index results assume the re-investment of all dividends and interest and do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses.
The information provided is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment, legal or tax advice nor should such information contained herein be construed as a recommendation or advice to purchase or sell any security, investment, or portfolio allocation. An investor should consult with their financial advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategies and investment vehicles. Investment decisions should be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. This presentation makes no implied or express recommendations concerning the way any client’s accounts should or would be handled, as appropriate investment decisions depend upon the client’s specific investment objectives.
Investment advisory services offered through Magnus; securities offered through third party custodial relationships. More information about Magnus can be found on its Form ADV at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
Terms of Use
Definitions
Asset class performance was measured using the following benchmarks: U.S. Large Cap Stocks: S&P 500 TR Index; U.S. Small & Micro Cap: Russell 2000 TR Index; Intl Dev Large Cap Stocks: MSCI EAFE GR Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Stocks: MSCI Emerging Markets GR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Muni Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 (1-12 Yr) Muni Bond TR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; U.S. High Yield Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield TR Index; U.S. Bank Loans: S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan Index; Intl Developed Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-U.S. Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Bonds: JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified TR Index; U.S. REITs: MSCI U.S. REIT GR Index, Ex U.S. Real Estate Securities: S&P Global Ex-U.S. Property TR Index; Commodity Futures: Bloomberg Commodity TR Index; Midstream Energy: Alerian MLP TR Index; Gold: LBMA Gold Price, U.S. 60/40: 60% S&P 500 TR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; Global 60/40: 60% MSCI ACWI GR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond TR Index.