Magnus documents: Form ADV  | Form CRS  | Privacy Policy

Market Commentary – May, 2024

Power Play

  • May was nearly ideal for most asset classes, and U.S. equities performed best as large cap and small cap stocks both rose 5%. Intermediate-term bonds ended the month up 1.7%—their best monthly return this year.
  • While AI excitement remains centered on mega-cap technology companies like Nvidia, there is growing attention on the infrastructure needed for AI development, particularly the vast data and significant electricity required to train and run learning models.
  • At the sector level, information technology was the top performer, gaining 10% over May, followed by utilities, which ended the month up 8%.
  • Markets have benefitted from the easing of inflation pressures, but maintaining stability requires keeping both inflation and bond yields contained.

The core inflation print of 3.6% year-over-year was the lowest in exactly three years

Overview

Throughout May was a nearly ideal month for most asset classes. U.S. equities fared best,with both U.S. large cap stocks and U.S. small cap stocks ending the month up 5%. Eventhe downtrodden bond market ended the month in the green. U.S. intermediate-term bonds ended May up 1.7%—their best monthly return this year.

Revised first-quarter gross domestic product (GDP) estimates showed annualized quarter-over-quarter GDP growth lowered from 1.6% to 1.3%, driven primarily by declines in consumer spending, as personal consumption was revised down from 2.5% to 2.0%.1 After dipping into contractionary territory in April, the ISM Manufacturing PMI showed continued weakness in May, dropping further into contractionary territory with a reading of 48.7.2 In contrast to the stalling manufacturing sector, the services sector rebounded in May. The ISM Services PMI hit 53.8 (after briefly dipping into contractionary territory in April with a reading of 49.4).3 The April inflation report, released in May, showed headline inflation slightly decreasing from 3.5% year-over-year to 3.4%.4 The core inflation print of 3.6% year-over-year was the lowest in exactly three years.

In May, the Federal Open Market Committee (FOMC) yet again kept interest rates unchanged. During the meeting, Fed Chair Jerome Powell expressed concerns about a “lack of further progress” on inflation.5 He also announced a more aggressive-than-expected quantitative tightening (QT) taper: starting June 1, the monthly redemption cap on Treasury securities will decrease from $60 billion to $25 billion.6 Despite inflation remaining above 3% and surpassing the Fed’s official 2% target for over three years, the Fed’s recent QT taper decision indicates a more accommodative approach to enduring higher inflation. Market expectations for interest rate cuts continued to hover between one and two for 2024, and the first cut is expected at the September FOMC meeting.7

Graph of ISM services and manufacturing PMI trends.

More than half of the S&P 500’s monthly gains were driven by Nvidia alone, which ended the month up 25%

By the end of May, 98% of S&P 500 companies had reported first-quarter earnings results.8 Earnings growth for the quarter steadily improved from 3.4% at the end of March to 5.9% by the end of May.8 Notably, full-year 2024 and 2025 earnings per share estimates have increased, driven primarily by the communication services and information technology sector.8 Both earnings growth and S&P 500 stock market performance have largely been driven by a handful of mega-cap companies. Nvidia, Microsoft, Apple, and Alphabet together added over $1.4 trillion in market cap over the past month, surpassing the combined gains of the other 296 stocks that ended the month positive. More than half of the gains were driven by Nvidia alone, which ended the month up 25%.9 At a sector level, information technology was the top-performing sector, gaining 10% over May, followed by the utilities sector, which ended the month up 8%.

Power Play

Coincidentally, May 2023 was dominated by the artificial intelligence (AI) boom, triggered by the release of OpenAI’s ChatGPT in November 2022 and fueled by surging investor excitement about the potential impact of AI on the global economy.

Some of the market’s focus has shifted to the infrastructure needed to support the continued development of AI

AI mentioned in 2024 earnings calls by S&P 500 sectors.

(By some estimates, AI could contribute as much as $15 trillion to the global economy by 2050).10,11

Nvidia, a key driver of the AI boom, saw its share price gain more than 40% in May 2023 after announcing first-quarter earnings results that far exceeded expectations due to rising demand for AI microchips.12 Over the past year, the excitement surrounding AI has persisted. Nearly 40% of S&P 500 companies (around 200) mentioned “AI” in their first-quarter 2024 earnings calls, almost double the number of mentions in first-quarter earnings calls last year.13

Although AI excitement continues to revolve primarily around a handful of mega-cap technology companies (think Nvidia), some of the focus has shifted to the infrastructure needed to support the continued development of AI. Over the past year, it has become clear that artificial intelligence requires vast amounts of data to train learning models, which in turn demands significant electricity usage. For example, estimates show that AI applications such as ChatGPT-3 may consume up to ten times the energy used by Google for a search.14 Furthermore, AI-model training requires large numbers of graphics processing unit (GPU) servers and specialized data centers to accommodate the intense computational demands. These data centers consume significant amounts of water (for cooling), energy, and land. The amount of land needed for an AI data center can vary significantly, ranging between 10 to 1,200 acres—which is the size of the data center campus recently purchased by Amazon.15 A study by the University of California has found that OpenAI’s ChatGPT-3 “consumes” a 16-ounce bottle of water (for cooling purposes) for every 10-50 responses it generates.16 The study also found that training a large language model (such as ChatGPT-3) in Microsoft’s high-end data centers can directly evaporate around 185,000 gallons of water per day.16

The volume of data generated in the next five years might double that of the past decade

In the U.S., power generation has remained relatively stable over the past 20 years, growing modestly by around 0.4% a year.17 Electricity demand has also remained relatively steady over this time.18 However, this stability is likely to be disrupted as the demand for (and from) AI and data centers escalates. Recent studies suggest that the volume of data generated by businesses and consumers in the next five years will double that of the past decade.19

Graph showing U.S. data center electricity demand increase.

Data centers could account for between 6.0% and 7.5% of total electricity demand by 2030

Forecasts by Boston Consulting Group indicate that data centers could account for between 6.0% and 7.5% of total electricity demand by 2030, necessitating an annual increased production of between three and seven gigawatts of new power capacity to meet these needs.20 This represents a 15% compound annual growth rate, equal to the electricity consumed by one-third of U.S. homes.20\

Futuristic AI robot in industrial landscape

Companies have started to turn to nuclear power as a solution to the energy demands of AI

In order to meet these energy demands, the U.S. has started to push back the retirement dates of the country’s aging coal fleet.21 Approximately 4% of the country’s total coal- powered electricity capacity is to be retired by 2030—a 40% downward revision from last year.21 However, coal’s share of power continues to decline, and ongoing reliance on coal is recognizably unsustainable. Instead, companies have started to turn to nuclear power as a solution. Narratives around nuclear power have begun shifting, with the United Nations in December 2023 recognizing its significant role in reducing carbon emissions and mitigating climate change. At the 28th United Nations Climate Change Conference of the Parties (COP28), companies from 140 different countries signed the Net Zero Nuclear Industry Pledge, committing to support the expansion of nuclear energy to achieve net-zero emissions by 2050.22 Twenty nations, including the U.S., France, Sweden, and the United Arab Emirates, have committed to triple nuclear energy capacity by 2050.22

Nuclear power has also piqued the interest of Silicon Valley, and both startups and mega-cap tech companies have begun investing. Oklo, a startup backed by the founder of OpenAI, Sam Altman, started trading on the New York Stock Exchange in May. Oklo aims to develop mini nuclear reactors to power data centers, including those used by AI companies.23,24 Amazon recently purchased a 100% nuclear-powered data center in Pennsylvania from Talen Energy.25 The data center is expected to be powered directly by the neighboring nuclear power plant, Susquehanna, with Amazon committing to up to 960 megawatts of power from the plant over the next several years.25 Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg believes the key challenge for AI over the next few years will be energy constraints. According to Zuckerberg, energy constraints have held back Meta’s own data center buildout: “I think we would probably build out bigger clusters than we currently can if we could get the energy to do it.”26 Also potentially adding to power needs driven by AI demand, Microsoft is reportedly considering building a $100 billion supercomputer campus to develop AI models in a project called Stargate.27,28

The average construction timeline for a nuclear plant generally ranges between seven and ten years

While nuclear power appears to be one of the emerging leaders in meeting AI and data center energy requirements, it will not be an immediate solution. There are currently 60 nuclear reactors being constructed worldwide, and an additional 110 are planned to start over the next five years.29 However, there are currently only thirteen nuclear reactors proposed in the U.S., which have not yet been approved. The average construction timeline for a nuclear plant, from approval to becoming operational, generally ranges between seven and ten years.30

AI’s energy requirements have inevitably led to increased attention on the U.S. utilities sector, especially those companies generating and distributing electricity for data centers. These companies tend to primarily reside in the historically low-growth utilities sector. Between 2018 and 2022, earnings growth across the S&P 500 utilities sector was negative, and revenue growth fell below the average inflation rate of 3.6% over the period.31 However, many of these companies are now estimated to grow at 6% or more per year over the next 15 years.32 Despite being the second worst-performing S&P 500 sector over the past five years (with real estate faring worst), the utilities sector is the top-performing S&P 500 sector year-to-date, up 15.8%. In comparison, the communication services sector is up 14.9%, and the technology sector is up 9.4%.

Markets

With the exception of U.S. intermediate-term municipal bonds (which ended the month down 0.7%), all major asset classes ended May with positive returns. U.S. large cap stocks and U.S. small cap stocks were the top performers, both ending the month up 5.0%, followed by U.S. REITs, which gained 4.7%.

Nearly all major asset classes ended May with positive returns

May 2024 market returns bar chart.

In addition to the U.S., the United Kingdom, and France, 21 emerging economies are holding elections this year

Emerging and frontier market stocks gained 0.6%, while international developed market large cap stocks ended May up 4.0%. U.S. intermediate-term bonds ended the month up 1.7%—the best monthly return this year.

Overseas, the past month was characterized by presidential elections in several developing market countries. India held its general elections between April 19 and June, and the country’s National Democratic Alliance won the majority while incumbent Prime Minister Narendra Modi won a historic third term.33 On May 29, South Africa held national elections, and the African National Congress lost majority power for the first time in 30 years. A coalition government now needs to be formed.34 On June 2, Mexico held its general elections, with Claudia Sheinbaum, the Party of the Democratic Revolution, winning.35 The MSCI South Africa Index ended the month flat, down 0.1%, while the MSCI Mexico Index ended the month down 2.5% and the MSCI India Index gained 0.7%. Year to date, the MSCI India Index is up 9.3%, though the MSCI South Africa Index is down 4.3% and the MSCI Mexico Index is down 5.7% Twenty-one emerging economies were scheduled to hold elections this year, and 14 of these elections have already taken place. Among developed market countries, the U.S., the United Kingdom, and France are holding elections this year.36

Gold ended May up 1.2%, reaching a new record high of $2,421. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude ended the month at $77 per barrel, dropping $5 per barrel (or 6%) over the month. After remaining largely unchanged over the month, the national average price per gallon of regular unleaded gas dropped from $3.6 per gallon to $3.5 per gallon by the end of May, the largest weekly drop year-to-date.37

We believe the stability of the economy and markets hinges on keeping inflation and interest rates contained

Looking Forward

We continue to believe the bond market’s reaction to growth and inflation data, particularly at the longer end of the curve, is critical to the trajectory of the economy and markets. With the 10-year Treasury yield around 4.5% and the two-year yield near 4.9%, we will see how well bond markets will tolerate the Fed’s relatively lax approach to the “last mile” of inflation. If yields rise much more, they will likely affect broader markets, especially rate-sensitive segments, including real estate, regional banks, non-profitable small caps, and low-end consumers. Conversely, if yields can stay contained, there could be plenty of runway for risky assets.

Our view remains that as long as higher rates persist, they will continue to accentuate the difference in prospects between faster-growing and/or highly profitable businesses relative to those that are not, creating a tailwind for active managers. While the immediate impact of any further easing by the Federal Reserve will likely be viewed as positive for all risky assets, persistent inflation could continue to frustrate efforts to manage it. The ongoing policy tug-of-war means opportunities and risks will ebb and flow, with significant implications for inflation and interest rates, which will, in turn, dictate economic activity. Ultimately, we believe the stability of the economy and markets hinges on keeping inflation and interest rates contained.

Citations

  1. Bureau of Economic Analysis: https://www.bea.gov/data/gdp/gross-domestic-product
  2. ISM: https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-report-on-business/pmi/may/
  3. ISM: https://www.ismworld.org/supply-management-news-and-reports/reports/ism-report-on-business/services/may/
  4. Bureau of Labor Statistics: https://bls.gov/cpi/home.htm
  5. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/markets/rates-bonds/fed-hold-rates-steady-inflation-dims-hopes-policy-easing-2024-05-01/
  6. Federal Reserve: https://www.federalreserve.gov/mediacenter/files/FOMCpresconf20240501.pdf
  7. CME Group: https://www.cmegroup.com/markets/interest-rates/cme-fedwatch-tool.html
  8. FactSet: https://advantage.factset.com/hubfs/Website/Resources%20Section/Research%20Desk/Earnings%20Insight/EarningsInsight_053124.pdf
  9. Wall Street Journal: https://www.wsj.com/finance/stocks/this-record-stock-market-is-riding-on-questionable-ai-assumptions-cb890703
  10. PwC: https://www.pwc.com/gx/en/issues/data-and-analytics/publications/artificial-intelligence-study.html
  11. McKinsey: https://www.mckinsey.com/capabilities/mckinsey-digital/our-insights/the-economic-potential-of-generative-ai-the-next-productivity-frontier
  12. CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2023/05/24/nvidia-nvda-earnings-report-q1-2024.html
  13. FactSet: https://insight.factset.com/highest-number-of-sp-500-companies-citing-ai-on-earnings-calls-over-past-10-years
  14. International Energy Agency: https://iea.blob.core.windows.net/assets/6b2fd954-2017-408e-bf08-952fdd62118a/Electricity2024-Analysisandforecastto2026.pdf
  15. Data Center Dynamics: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/aws-acquires-talens-nuclear-data-center-campus-in-pennsylvania/
  16. Newsweek: https://www.newsweek.com/why-ai-so-thirsty-data-centers-use-massive-amounts-water-1882374
  17. Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/188521/total-us-electricity-net-generation/
  18. Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/201794/us-electricity-consumption-since-1975/
  19. Financial Times: https://markets.ft.com/data/announce/detail?dockey=600-202405150930PR_NEWS_USPRX____CL14418-1
  20. Boston Consulting Group via LinkedIn: https://www.linkedin.com/pulse/impact-genai-electricity-how-fueling-data-center-boom-vivian-lee/
  21. Financial Times: https://www.ft.com/content/ddaac44b-e245-4c8a-bf68-c773cc8f4e63
  22. World Nuclear Association: https://world-nuclear.org/news-and-media/press-statements/net-zero-nuclear-industry-pledge-sets-goal-for-tri
  23. NBC News: https://www.nbcnews.com/tech/tech-news/nuclear-power-oklo-sam-altman-ai-energy-rcna139094
  24. CNBC: https://www.cnbc.com/2021/06/28/oklo-planning-nuclear-micro-reactors-that-run-off-nuclear-waste.html
  25. American Nuclear Society: https://www.ans.org/news/article-5842/amazon-buys-nuclearpowered-data-center-from-talen/
  26. Data Center Dynamics: https://www.datacenterdynamics.com/en/news/metas-mark-zuckerberg-says-energy-constraints-are-holding-back-ai-data-center-buildout/
  27. Forbes: https://www.forbes.com/sites/cindygordon/2024/03/31/microsoft-and-openai-partnering-on-stargate-a-100b-us-data-center/
  28. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/technology/microsoft-openai-planning-100-billion-data-center-project-information-reports-2024-03-29/
  29. World Nuclear Association: https://world-nuclear.org/information-library/current-and-future-generation/plans-for-new-reactors-worldwide
  30. Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/712841/median-construction-time-for-reactors-since-1981/
  31. FRED: https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/CPIAUCS
  32. Reaves Asset Management: https://info.reavesam.com/lp-why-is-the-utility-sector-heating-up-for-investors
  33. AP News: https://apnews.com/article/india-election-results-2024-lok-sabha-modi-bjp-7893efecc83fa8225a611f174e6420ee
  34. BBC: https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cgee5n9jen9o
  35. AP News: https://apnews.com/article/mexico-elections-president-governorships-lopez-obrador-d7fef5c7ac964072401ba6d9809dd7d4
  36. Reuters: https://www.reuters.com/markets/global-markets-election-pix-graphic-2024-04-09/
  37. AAA: https://gasprices.aaa.com/
Share it :
Disclaimer

Magnus Financial Group LLC (“Magnus”) did not produce and bears no responsibility for any part of this report whatsoever, including but not limited to any microeconomic views, inaccuracies or any errors or omissions. Research and data used in the presentation have come from third-party sources that Magnus has not independently verified presentation and the opinions expressed are not by Magnus or its employees and are current only as of the time made and are subject to change without notice.

This report may include estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements, however, due to numerous factors, actual events may differ substantially from those presented. The graphs and tables making up this report have been based on unaudited, third-party data and performance information provided to us by one or more commercial databases. Except for the historical information contained in this report, certain matters are forward looking statements or projections that are dependent upon risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to factors and considerations such as general market volatility, global economic risk, geopolitical risk, currency risk and other country-specific factors, fiscal and monetary policy, the level of interest rates, security-specific risks, and historical market segment or sector performance relationships as they relate to the business and economic cycle.

Additionally, please be aware that past performance is not a guide to the future performance of any manager or strategy, and that the performance results and historical information provided displayed herein may have been adversely or favorably impacted by events and economic conditions that will not prevail in the future. Therefore, it should not be inferred that these results are indicative of the future performance of any strategy, index, fund, manager or group of managers. Index benchmarks contained in this report are provided so that performance can be compared with the performance of well-known and widely recognized indices. Index results assume the re-investment of all dividends and interest and do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses.

The information provided is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment, legal or tax advice nor should such information contained herein be construed as a recommendation or advice to purchase or sell any security, investment, or portfolio allocation. An investor should consult with their financial advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategies and investment vehicles. Investment decisions should be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. This presentation makes no implied or express recommendations concerning the way any client’s accounts should or would be handled, as appropriate investment decisions depend upon the client’s specific investment objectives.

Investment advisory services offered through Magnus; securities offered through third party custodial relationships. More information about Magnus can be found on its Form ADV at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.

Terms of Use
This report is intended solely for the use of its recipient. There is a fee associated with the access to this report and the information and materials presented herein. Re-distribution or republication of this report and its contents are prohibited. Expert use is implied.
Definitions

Asset class performance was measured using the following benchmarks: U.S. Large Cap Stocks: S&P 500 TR Index; U.S. Small & Micro Cap: Russell 2000 TR Index; Intl Dev Large Cap Stocks: MSCI EAFE GR Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Stocks: MSCI Emerging Markets GR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Muni Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 (1-12 Yr) Muni Bond TR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; U.S. High Yield Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield TR Index; U.S. Bank Loans: S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan Index; Intl Developed Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-U.S. Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Bonds: JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified TR Index; U.S. REITs: MSCI U.S. REIT GR Index, Ex U.S. Real Estate Securities: S&P Global Ex-U.S. Property TR Index; Commodity Futures: Bloomberg Commodity TR Index; Midstream Energy: Alerian MLP TR Index; Gold: LBMA Gold Price, U.S. 60/40: 60% S&P 500 TR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; Global 60/40: 60% MSCI ACWI GR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond TR Index.

Contact Us