An Independent Financial Advisory Firm
An Independent Financial Advisory Firm
You are now leaving the Magnus Financial Group Website and will be entering the Charles Schwab & Co., Inc. (“Schwab”) Website.
Schwab is a registered broker-dealer, and is not affiliated with Magnus Financial Group or any advisor(s) whose name(s) appears on this Website. Magnus Financial Group is/are independently owned and operated. Schwab neither endorses nor recommends Magnus Financial Group. Regardless of any referral or recommendation, Schwab does not endorse or recommend the investment strategy of any advisor. Schwab has agreements with Magnus Financial Group under which Schwab provides Magnus Financial Group with services related to your account. Schwab does not review the Magnus Financial Group Website(s), and makes no representation regarding the content of the Website(s). The information contained in the Magnus Financial Group Website should not be considered to be either a recommendation by Schwab or a solicitation of any offer to purchase or sell any securities.
Market Commentary
Market Commentary – August, 2025
A Curious Balance
U.S. economic data showed a mix of softening in some areas, like the labor market, and strength in others
Overview
U.S. large-cap stocks, measured by the S&P 500 Index, rose 2.0% in August. U.S. small- cap stocks, as proxied by the Russell 2000 Index, ended the month up a noteworthy 7.1%. This marked the Russell 2000’s strongest monthly return since November 2024 and its best August since 2000. U.S. intermediate-term bonds, as proxied by the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index, gained 1.2% in August. Economic data in the U.S. struck a curious balance between softening in some areas, like the labor market, but continued
strength in other areas.
U.S. small-cap stocks gained 7.1% in August
Recent data points to slowing momentum in the labor market
August started with the release of the July jobs report, which showed nonfarm payrolls adding only 73,000 new jobs over the month and missing estimates by 32,000. The report also revised down May and June payrolls by a combined 258,000—the largest downward revision outside of April and May 2020, when pandemic-related adjustments were made.1 Private payrolls also undershot expectations, with ADP reporting only 54,000 jobs added in August, while corporate layoffs surged 39% year-over-year to nearly 86,000—the highest August tally since 2020.2,3 The August jobs report, released in early September, showed just 22,000 jobs added over the month. It also included further downward revisions to June, which now shows payrolls falling by 13,000—the first monthly decline in employment since 2020.4 These figures underscore mounting evidence that the labor market is losing momentum.
Goods prices remained subdued in July, easing concerns over tariff-related pass-through effects
Inflation data released during the month showed headline CPI rising 2.7% year-over-year in July (the fastest pace since January) while core CPI increased 3.1%.5 Each month, the Bureau of Labor Statistics gathers roughly 90,000 price quotes across 200 categories, but with more than 30% of CPI inputs now estimated (up from the usual 10%) nearly a third of today’s index is built on approximations rather than directly observed prices.6 Goods prices remained subdued, easing concerns over tariff-related pass-through effects. For example, major appliances, which rose 1.9% month-over-month in June and are more than 60% imported, fell 2.4% in July.7 Smartphone prices, which were previously highlighted as a tariff-sensitive category, remained unchanged for the second consecutive month.7 Notably, the U.S. share of smartphone shipments coming out of China dropped from 61% in the second quarter of 2024 to just 25% in the second quarter of 2025.8
On the trade front, the President signed an executive order extending the tariff truce with China by 90 days, through November 10.9 The extension delayed a planned escalation that could have increased U.S. duties on Chinese goods from 40% to as high as 145%. Separately, on August 27, tariffs of 50% on goods imported from India—reflecting a 25% penalty linked to India’s continued purchases of Russian oil—took effect.10 Negotiations between the U.S. and India continued throughout the month without a formal agreement. Overall, U.S. tariff revenues set another record in August, with $31 billion collected.11
U.S. tariff revenue continues to climb
GDP estimates showed the U.S. economy growing at an annualized 3.3% in the second quarter
Jackson Hole has often been the platform for important Fed framework announcements
A Curious Balance
The Federal Reserve remained in focus in August with the annual Jackson Hole Economic Symposium. Organized by the Federal Reserve Bank of Kansas City since 1978, the conference has grown into one of the most influential gatherings for global central bankers, finance ministers, economists, and financial market participants. The keynote speech, which is typically delivered by the Fed Chair, is closely scrutinized by markets, as even subtle shifts in language can signal changes in the monetary policy outlook.
Markets first interpreted Powell’s speech as dovish, but a hawkish tone curbed rate-cut expectations
On August 22, Jerome Powell gave his last keynote speech as Federal Reserve Chair. Markets initially perceived Powell’s speech to be dovish (a dovish stance prefers easing monetary policy and lower interest rates, while a hawkish stance leans towards tighter monetary policy and higher interest rates) but a hawkish tone tampered interest rate cut expectations. Equity markets rallied (the S&P 500 ended the day up 1.5% and the Russell 2000 jumped 3.8%) while the 10-year Treasury yield dropped from 4.33% to 4.26%.
As Powell spoke, markets priced in a nearly 100% probability of a 0.25% rate cut at the September FOMC meeting, with some probability of a 0.5% cut beginning to emerge. By the end of the day, however, as investors reassessed his remarks, the probability of a September cut had slipped back to around 80%, the same level where it had started the week.17 As of the end of August, markets expected the equivalent of two 0.25% interest rate cuts before the end of 2025—one in September, and one in December.17
By month-end, markets expected two 0.25% rate cuts before 2026
At the 2020 Jackson Hole symposium, the Fed made its 2% target an average, allowing temporary overshoots
The Fed has now dropped its “makeup” strategy of allowing inflation above 2% to offset past shortfalls
Powell pointed out the ‘curious balance’ in the labor market
Five years later at Jackson Hole 2025 the Fed reset its framework. It dropped language referencing a “low-rate environment” and abandoned the “makeup” strategy that had permitted inflation to exceed 2% to offset past shortfalls.19 Even though headline inflation averaged 4.4% between August 2020 and August 2025—more than double the official inflation target—the Fed appeared to communicate comfort with that overshoot, and no desire to correct it. Further, the Fed returned to a version of flexible inflation targeting, emphasizing balance across its dual mandate of price stability and maximum employment.19 According to Powell:
“As it turned out, the idea of an intentional, moderate inflation overshoot had proved irrelevant. There was nothing intentional or moderate about the inflation that arrived a few months after we announced our 2020 changes to the consensus statement…”20
Importantly, the term “shortfalls” in employment was replaced with “deviations”. On the current balance between inflation and the labor market, Powell said:
“In the near term, risks to inflation are tilted to the upside, and risks to employment to the downside—a challenging situation… Overall, while the labor market appears to be in balance, it is a curious kind of balance that results from a marked slowing in both supply of and demand for workers. This unusual situation suggests that downside risks to employment are rising. And if those risks materialize, they can do so quickly in the form of sharply higher layoffs and rising unemployment.”19
Equity markets rallied on the possibility of a September rate cut
Powell opening up the possibility of a September interest rate cut supported market sentiment, contributing to a post-Jackson Hole rally in equity markets, particularly for small-cap stocks. The Russell 2000 gained 4% between August 22 and August 29, while the S&P 500 increased by 1.4% over the same period, reaching a new all-time high on August 28. International developed market stocks (as proxied by the MSCI EAFE Index) initially gained 1.6% on Powell’s Jackson Hole speech but declined by 0.4% between August 22 and August 29. The 10-year Treasury yield declined post-Jackson Hole, easing from 4.33% to 4.26% on August 22, and easing further to end the month at 4.23%. While elements of Powell’s speech at Jackson hole emphasized the significance of the 2% inflation target, markets appear to have interpreted his balance as a dovish tilt.
Markets are watching consumer inflation expectations amid recent framework shifts and Powell’s mixed signals
Given the framework adjustments and mixed comments from Powell, markets will be watching consumer inflation expectations closely. Prior to Jackson Hole, consumer surveys suggested expectations were well above target: the University of Michigan oneyear inflation expectation was 4.8%, with long-term expectations at 3.5%, while the New York Fed survey showed one-year expectations at 3.1% and five-year expectations at 2.9%.12,21
Helped by increased rate cut expectations, the U.S. dollar has weakened against other major currencies, with the U.S. Dollar Index ending August down 2.3% (and is down by 10.4% year-to-date), including a 1.3% drop on the day of Powell’s speech—a move that illustrated the net result of the “curious balance”. A weaker dollar could have mixed effects globally, potentially boosting exports, but also increasing the cost of imports.
The U.S. Dollar Index declined 1.3% on the day of Powell’s Jackson Hole speech
National average gas prices eased to their lowest August level in five years
Markets
U.S. large-cap stocks ended August up 2.0%, underperforming foreign peers by 2.3%, as international developed market stocks ended up 4.3%. U.S. small-cap stocks ended the month up a noteworthy 7.1% while international developed market small cap stocks ended the month up 4.6%. Since the April 8th S&P 500 market low, U.S. small-cap stocks have gained 34%, outperforming U.S. large-caps, which have gained 30%.
Gold, which remains a top performer year-to-date (gaining 31% since January), ended the month up 3.0%, and at a new record high of $3,445 per ounce. West Texas Intermediate (WTI) crude oil prices traded between $67 per barrel and $62 per barrel throughout the month, while national average gas prices eased to the lowest price for this time of year in five years.22
U.S. small-cap stocks outperformed large-cap counterparts in August
Gold ended the month at another record high
The Fed’s last two framework shifts allowed above-target inflation to persist while propping up growth and asset prices
Looking Forward
As policymakers search for what Powell called a ‘curious balance’ between inflation and employment, the outcome is less curious in the economy and markets: the last two Fed framework adjustments have tolerated inflation running above target for years while supporting nominal growth and asset prices.
Bond yields remain pivotal—so long as they stay contained, they enable this policy stance—and they themselves are in a curious balance, caught between a softening labor and housing market on one side and continued elevated inflation on the other. AI is beginning to reshape the labor market, but it may also deliver productivity gains that support corporate margins. Inflation continues to flow through via tariffs and targeted goods, though offsets include low energy prices and cooling housing costs. With most risky assets substantially above their April lows and valuations elevated, we believe investors should maintain a healthy level of risk—balanced, not excessive, and tilted toward areas with strong fundamentals and policy tailwinds.
Citations
Share it :
Disclaimer
Magnus Financial Group LLC (“Magnus”) did not produce and bears no responsibility for any part of this report whatsoever, including but not limited to any microeconomic views, inaccuracies or any errors or omissions. Research and data used in the presentation have come from third-party sources that Magnus has not independently verified presentation and the opinions expressed are not by Magnus or its employees and are current only as of the time made and are subject to change without notice.
This report may include estimates, projections or other forward-looking statements, however, due to numerous factors, actual events may differ substantially from those presented. The graphs and tables making up this report have been based on unaudited, third-party data and performance information provided to us by one or more commercial databases. Except for the historical information contained in this report, certain matters are forward looking statements or projections that are dependent upon risks and uncertainties, including but not limited to factors and considerations such as general market volatility, global economic risk, geopolitical risk, currency risk and other country-specific factors, fiscal and monetary policy, the level of interest rates, security-specific risks, and historical market segment or sector performance relationships as they relate to the business and economic cycle.
Additionally, please be aware that past performance is not a guide to the future performance of any manager or strategy, and that the performance results and historical information provided displayed herein may have been adversely or favorably impacted by events and economic conditions that will not prevail in the future. Therefore, it should not be inferred that these results are indicative of the future performance of any strategy, index, fund, manager or group of managers. Index benchmarks contained in this report are provided so that performance can be compared with the performance of well-known and widely recognized indices. Index results assume the re-investment of all dividends and interest and do not reflect any management fees, transaction costs or expenses.
The information provided is not intended to be, and should not be construed as, investment, legal or tax advice nor should such information contained herein be construed as a recommendation or advice to purchase or sell any security, investment, or portfolio allocation. An investor should consult with their financial advisor to determine the appropriate investment strategies and investment vehicles. Investment decisions should be made based on the investor’s specific financial needs and objectives, goals, time horizon and risk tolerance. This presentation makes no implied or express recommendations concerning the way any client’s accounts should or would be handled, as appropriate investment decisions depend upon the client’s specific investment objectives.
Investment advisory services offered through Magnus; securities offered through third party custodial relationships. More information about Magnus can be found on its Form ADV at www.adviserinfo.sec.gov.
Terms of Use
Definitions
Asset class performance was measured using the following benchmarks: U.S. Large Cap Stocks: S&P 500 TR Index; U.S. Small & Micro Cap: Russell 2000 TR Index; Intl Dev Large Cap Stocks: MSCI EAFE GR Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Stocks: MSCI Emerging Markets GR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Muni Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays 1-10 (1-12 Yr) Muni Bond TR Index; U.S. Intermediate-Term Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; U.S. High Yield Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Corporate High Yield TR Index; U.S. Bank Loans: S&P/LSTA U.S. Leveraged Loan Index; Intl Developed Bonds: Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate ex-U.S. Index; Emerging & Frontier Market Bonds: JPMorgan EMBI Global Diversified TR Index; U.S. REITs: MSCI U.S. REIT GR Index, Ex U.S. Real Estate Securities: S&P Global Ex-U.S. Property TR Index; Commodity Futures: Bloomberg Commodity TR Index; Midstream Energy: Alerian MLP TR Index; Gold: LBMA Gold Price, U.S. 60/40: 60% S&P 500 TR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR Index; Global 60/40: 60% MSCI ACWI GR Index; 40% Bloomberg Barclays Global Aggregate Bond TR Index.